Supreme Court of Virginia· 3/4/1974
Paul v. Paul
Citations
- 214 Va. 651
- 203 S.E.2d 123
- 1974 Va. LEXIS 193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, because there were other support provisions in the agreement, it was clear the parties intended that support continue past the age of majority
- “The law effective when the contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein.”
- \The law effective when the contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein.\
- “The law effective when the contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein.”
- law in force at time property settlement agreement was made determines rights and duties under it
- it is clear that the parties intended to support children past majority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-27· cited 119×
- Fry v. SchwartingCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-04-21· cited 103×
- Tiffany v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1985-08-06· cited 93×
- Southerland v. Estate of SoutherlandSupreme Court of Virginia· 1995-04-21· cited 79×
- Cutshaw v. CutshawSupreme Court of Virginia· 1979-12-28· cited 65×
- In Re Anna S. Litton, Debtor. Anna S. Litton, Debtor-Appellant v. Wachovia Bank, Creditorappellee, Jo S. Widener, Trustee-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 2003-05-27· cited 64×
- Pellegrin v. PellegrinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-03-14· cited 53×
- Harbour Gate Owners' Ass'n v. BergSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-09-05· cited 44×
- Wright v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2008-01-11· cited 42×
- Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-04-28· cited 42×
- Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-10· cited 34×
- Esparza v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-04-27· cited 29×
- Harris v. WoodrumCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-11-18· cited 28×
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia· 1999-01-08· cited 26×
- Hering v. HeringCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-09-05· cited 26×
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1985-09-17· cited 24×
- Dorothy M. Farish, Guardian for Shirley F. Farish v. Courion Industries, Inc. And Otis Elevator CompanyFourth Circuit· 1983-12-01· cited 23×
- Goldin v. GoldinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-12-12· cited 21×
- CRS Sirrine, Inc. v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-06-16· cited 21×
- Gazale v. GazaleSupreme Court of Virginia· 1979-01-12· cited 18×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court· 1972-06-15· cited 111×
- Duffy v. HartsockSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-03-01· cited 72×
- Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1966-03-25· cited 37×
- Maxey v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1942-12-07· cited 32×
- Garey v. GareyTennessee Supreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 30×
- Hall v. MacLeodSupreme Court of Virginia· 1950-11-27· cited 20×
- Mason v. MasonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-03-16· cited 15×
- Barbier v. BarbierMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-03-23· cited 15×
- Citizens Mutual Building Ass'n v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1937-01-14· cited 11×
- King v. SanchezLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1973-02-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.