· 12/12/2000
Goldin v. Goldin
Citations
- 538 S.E.2d 326
- 34 Va. App. 95
- 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “power to modify child support is not affected by the prior act of affirming, ratifying and incorporating into the divorce decree the child support agreement between the husband and wife” (emphasis added)
- “The divorce court’s jurisdiction over the child is eliminated ipso facto when the child reaches his majority.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.