Court of Appeals of Virginia· 3/14/2000

Pellegrin v. Pellegrin

Citations

525 S.E.2d 611
31 Va. App. 753
2000 Va. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that wife’s motion for a rule to show cause seeking compliance with a property settlement agreement was an “action for enforcement” and awarding attorney’s fees under the terms of the agreement
noting that “a property settlement agreement is a contract between the parties”
allowing attorney’s fees - 16 - for a motion to show cause as an “action for enforcement” under the PSA
allowing attorney’s fees for a motion to show cause as an “action for enforcement” under the PSA
affirming fee award under a contractual provision authorizing fees for the “successful enforcement of any of the provisions of the agreement” where wife successfully defeated husband’s mistaken interpretation of the separation agreement
final decree and property settlement agreement entered 1991 and pursuant to Code § 20-109, husband requested modification of his spousal support because wife was cohabiting with another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pellegrin v. Pellegrin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.