Paul v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a summary by Experian that identified the alleged author of the letter and the nature of its contents to be sufficient
• “The weight of authority in other circuits indicates that without a showing that the reported information was in fact inaccurate, a claim brought under § 1681i must fail.”
• “[T]he reason for the late pay- ment is not relevant; the statute concerns accuracy.”
• “[A]lthough Experian sent credit reports containing late payment history to several potential creditors, . . . Paul fails to demonstrate any negative repercussions, or any actual injury, connected with the publication of the credit reports.”
• collecting cases and identifying additional elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).