Catherine Willis v. Childrens Hospital of Pittsbur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the PHRA is interpreted identically to the ADEA without analyzing in detail the text of the provisions at issue
• “Satisfying the prima facie elements creates an ‘inference of unlawful discrimination.’”
• “A passing reference to retirement age and [the plaintiff’s] own belief that age discrimination occurred do not comprise sufficient evidence” to survive summary judgment
• “To succeed on an ADEA claim, a plaintiff must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that age was the ‘but-for’ cause of the adverse employment action.”
• “To succeed on an ADEA claim, a plaintiff must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that age was the ‘but-for’ cause of the adverse employment action.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).