Patterson Ex Rel. Chaney v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expenditure of 33.75 hours was reasonable after 24 conducting “a survey of several dozen cases”
• holding that “33.75 hours spent by plaintiff's 18 |}counsel” was reasonable based on “a survey of several dozen [Social Security fee] cases’’
• noting that “a survey of 27 several dozen cases in which attorney’s fees were awarded in social security 28 1 2 approved range,” and collecting cases
• noting that “a survey of several dozen cases in which attorney’s fees 16 were awarded in social security cases suggests that the 33.75 hours spent by plaintiff’s 17 counsel falls within the approved range”
• noting that “a survey of several dozen cases in which attorney’s fees were 16 awarded in social security cases suggests that the 33.75 hours spent by plaintiff’s 17 counsel falls within the approved range”
• noting that “a survey of several dozen cases in which attorney’s 20 fees were awarded in social security cases suggests that the 33.75 hours spent by 21 plaintiff’s counsel falls within the approved range”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).