N.D. California· 7/13/1992
Afanador v. Sullivan
Citations
- 809 F. Supp. 61
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19416
- 1992 WL 382566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting EAJA motion for 22.3 hours of work performed by the plaintiffs attorney and 9.5 hours of work performed by the attorney’s law clerk
- without analysis, court found 22.3 hours reasonable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ware
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 3,376×
- Bunnell v. SullivanNinth Circuit· 1991-10-01· cited 2,116×
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 844×
- Clementine COTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1986-09-18· cited 547×
- Jose Ramon-Sepulveda v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1988-12-20· cited 85×
- Herbert W. Timms, Dba Petrol Express Petrol Express Cooperative and Petrol Stops Northwest v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1984-09-05· cited 33×
- Animal Lovers Volunteer Ass'n v. CarlucciNinth Circuit· 1989-02-09· cited 26×
- James Cardwell v. Jerome KurtzNinth Circuit· 1985-07-08· cited 15×
- Herman W. SWENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1986-10-06· cited 15×
- Spurlock v. SullivanN.D. California· 1992-01-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.