Sorich v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a consensual remand could not have been a voluntary dismissal because it was not labeled a dismissal
• finding a voluntary remand on the SSA’s motion to be pursuant to sentence four because “for all practical purposes ... it forced the [SSA] to review the denial of benefits again”
• when “the Polaski ease is cited but the factors are not seriously discussed in relationship to inconsistencies found by the ALJ, it is impossible for a reviewing court ... to properly do its job” and the case must be reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).