Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 8/8/2007

Patel v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 829
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18765
  • 2007 WL 2255213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Board’s ineffectiveness determination is discretionary
  • “We could deny the petition based solely on Patel’s fail- ure to meet one Lozada requirement[.]”
  • “We could deny the petition based solely on Patel’s fail- ure to meet one Lozada requirement[.]”
  • “We could deny the petition based solely on Patel’s fail- ure to meet one Lozada requirement[.]”
  • “We could deny the petition based solely on Patel’s fail- ure to meet one Lozada requirement[.]”
  • “We could deny the petition based solely on Patel’s fail- ure to meet one Lozada requirement[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Patel v. Gonzales

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.