Skip to main content
· 3/22/1996

Wodziak v. Kash

Citations

  • 663 N.E.2d 138
  • 278 Ill. App. 3d 901
  • 215 Ill. Dec. 388
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to properly preserve an issue for appeal, a party must make a contemporaneous objection in the trial court
  • stating that to properly preserve an issue for appeal, a party must make a contemporaneous objection in the trial court
  • stating that to properly preserve an issue for appeal, a party must make a contemporaneous objection in the trial court
  • finding “scant evidentiary value” in a medical malpractice defendant’s self-serving testimony, due to bias
  • finding \scant evidentiary value\ in a medical malpractice defendant's self-serving testimony, due to bias
  • allowing reduction of award by amount received in prior settlement, under the JTCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.