Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the general verdict rule is only a presumption
• determining whether section 9f was retroactive without answering the question raised in Randich
• stating that a “vested ground of defense is as fully protected from being cut off or destroyed by - 58 - No. 1-23-0196 an act of the legislature as is a vested cause of action.” (quoting Heinrich v. Libertyville High School, 186 Ill. 2d 381, 404-05 (1998)
• determining whether section 9f was retroactive without answering the question raised in Randich
• applying the general verdict rule to claims not involving jury instruction
• the failure to raise an issue in the circuit court or appellate court results in forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).