Skip to main content

Parsi v. Daioleslam

Citations

  • 852 F. Supp. 2d 82
  • 87 Fed. R. Serv. 1404
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44300
  • 2012 WL 1066734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “because ‘[e]xpert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading,’ a court has greater leeway in excluding expert testimony under Rule 403 than it does lay witness testimony.”
  • facts and data relied upon by expert were \patently insufficient\ where expert \read only an apparently haphazard selection of defendant's sources\
  • facts and data relied upon by expert were “patently insufficient” where expert “read only an apparently haphazard selection of defendant’s sources”
  • “Because expert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading, a court has greater leeway in excluding expert testimony under Rule 403 than it does lay witness testimony.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.