In Re Air Crash Disaster at New Orleans, Louisiana on July 9, 1982. Pearl Crosby Eymard v. Pan American World Airways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “trial courts must be wary lest the expert become nothing more than an advocate of policy before the jury.”
• noting that “the trial judge ought to insist that a proffered expert bring to the jury more than the lawyers can offer in argument”
• stating that “experts whose opinions are available to the highest bidder have no place testifying in a court of law, before a jury, and with the imprimatur of the trial judge’s deci sion that he is an ‘expert’ ”
• “Stated more directly, the trial judge ought to insist that a proffered expert bring to the jury more than the lawyers can offer in argument.”
• “[T]he trial judge ought to insist that a proffered expert bring to the jury more than the lawyers can offer in argument.”
• “Stated more directly, the trial judge ought to insist that a proffered expert bring to the jury more than the lawyers can offer in argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).