Parsi v. Daioleslam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “because ‘[e]xpert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading,’ a court has greater leeway in excluding expert testimony under Rule 403 than it does lay witness testimony.”
• facts and data relied upon by expert were \patently insufficient\ where expert \read only an apparently haphazard selection of defendant's sources\
• facts and data relied upon by expert were “patently insufficient” where expert “read only an apparently haphazard selection of defendant’s sources”
• “Because expert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading, a court has greater leeway in excluding expert testimony under Rule 403 than it does lay witness testimony.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).