Carrie A. Krampen v. James J. Krampen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hile we understand the desire of the attorneys and the trial court for expediency and efficiency, these concerns must yield to the proper presentation and admission, not oral summation, of all evidence needed to arrive at the correct conclusion”
• “While statements of counsel are not evidence, a clear and unequivocal admission of fact by an attorney is a judicial admission which is binding on the client.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).