Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/4/2009
Parker v. State
Citations
- 970 A.2d 320
- 408 Md. 428
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that this type of testimony is non-hearsay offered to show action in reliance upon a statement
- explaining that the de novo standard of review is applicable to the trial judge’s conclusion of law that the evidence at issue is or is not “of consequence to the determination of the action” (quoting Md. Rule 5-401)
- ‘When the trial judge’s ruling involves a legal question ..., we review the trial court’s ruling de novo.”
- “We review rulings on the admissibil ity of evidence ordinarily on an abuse of discretion standard.”
- “When the trial judge’s ruling involves a legal question ... we review the trial court’s ruling de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-10-27· cited 130×
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Ruffin Hotel Corp. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-21· cited 69×
- McNeal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-21· cited 42×
- Perry v. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-28· cited 37×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-11· cited 35×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 35×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-20· cited 33×
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 25×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-10-22· cited 19×
- Hendrix v. BurnsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-29· cited 14×
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-24· cited 14×
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 13×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 12×
- COLKLEY & FIELDS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-26· cited 8×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-29· cited 8×
- 600 North Frederick Road, LLC v. Burlington Coat FactoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-22· cited 7×
- Wallace-Bey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-02· cited 7×
- DULYX v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-21· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-28· cited 5×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- State v. BankstonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-06-26· cited 226×
- Chestnut v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-04-24· cited 111×
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-07· cited 110×
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-08· cited 70×
- J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-03-05· cited 68×
- Farrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-02-17· cited 65×
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 60×
- Escobar-Orejuela v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-02-22· cited 41×
- Stoddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-08· cited 38×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-09· cited 26×
- Zemo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-02· cited 24×
- State v. BraxterSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-01-08· cited 15×
- Purvis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-05· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.