Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 970 A.2d 320
  • 408 Md. 428
  • 2009 Md. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this type of testimony is non-hearsay offered to show action in reliance upon a statement
  • explaining that the de novo standard of review is applicable to the trial judge’s conclusion of law that the evidence at issue is or is not “of consequence to the determination of the action” (quoting Md. Rule 5-401)
  • ‘When the trial judge’s ruling involves a legal question ..., we review the trial court’s ruling de novo.”
  • “We review rulings on the admissibil ity of evidence ordinarily on an abuse of discretion standard.”
  • “When the trial judge’s ruling involves a legal question ... we review the trial court’s ruling de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.