Indiana Supreme Court· 5/20/1954
Woods v. State
Citations
- 119 N.E.2d 558
- 233 Ind. 320
- 1954 Ind. LEXIS 193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an irrebuttable presumption of prejudice where three state witnesses — two police officers and the sheriff — repeatedly visited jury members in a room where the jury congregated during recesses and intermissions
- where the Supreme Court of Indiana held that the police officers’/state’s witnesses’ conduct in visiting with jury members was “prima facie prejudicial” to the criminal defendant
- court has authority to order remodeling to provide facilities to segregate juries from witnesses
- a court has the right and duty to order appropriations for purposes of remodeling jury quarters where the autonomy of its branch is jeopardized by decrepit facilities because the judiciary is an independent and equal branch of the government with powers coequal with its duties
- where police officers visited with the jury during recess
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emmert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 159×
- O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-09-19· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-06-07· cited 112×
- NOBLE CTY. COUNCIL ETC. v. State Ex Rel. FiferIndiana Supreme Court· 1955-04-07· cited 76×
- State v. LivingstonTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-09-05· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. LavalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-07-15· cited 73×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-12· cited 70×
- Burrus v. SilhavyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-03-21· cited 60×
- Boles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 52×
- Ernesto Roberto Ramirez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-04-29· cited 50×
- State v. KendricksTennessee Supreme Court· 1994-12-05· cited 47×
- Pointon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 44×
- Carlson v. State Ex Rel. StodolaIndiana Supreme Court· 1966-10-18· cited 43×
- Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 40×
- Vaughn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-08-04· cited 38×
- Ketcham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1959-11-16· cited 34×
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1960-06-28· cited 33×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1964-09-28· cited 32×
- Knuepfer v. FawellIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 29×
- May v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 27×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-04-20· cited 118×
- Little v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-15· cited 59×
- Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court· 1894-01-23· cited 58×
- State ex rel. Yancey v. HydeIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-11-07· cited 47×
- Smythe v. BoswellIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-02-19· cited 42×
- Pearman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1954-02-11· cited 41×
- Board of Commissioners v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court· 1893-11-28· cited 38×
- Polson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1893-12-21· cited 38×
- Langenberg v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-05-10· cited 34×
- McDonel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-15· cited 32×
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1871-11-15· cited 28×
- Ex parte GriffithsIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-03-15· cited 22×
- Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1895-01-09· cited 18×
- Cross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-05-24· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.