Parke County v. Ropak, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding any error in exclusion of letter was harmless; although letter could have been used to impeach a witness, the impeachment concerned an issue separate from that on which the plaintiff brought its misrepresentation claim
• addressing what is now subsection 34-13-3-3(14) of the ITCA immunity statute
• “A person has a right to rely upon representations where the exercise of reasonable prudence does not dictate otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).