Decker v. Zengler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court could reasonably infer that affiant had personal knowledge of documents at issue and corresponding accounts based on affiant's position as a Litigation Recovery Specialist
• “Even if the trial court’s decision was an abuse of discretion, we will not reverse if the admission constituted harmless error.”
• decedent’s statement in will that joint bank accounts were to be divided among all children did not affect the right of survivorship; joint owner was entitled to receive all funds under the terms of the account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).