State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room Three

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[u]nder our rules of statutory construction, it cannot be presumed the General Assembly intended language used in a statute to be applied in an illogical manner.”
• stating that courts cannot presume that legislature \intended to do an absurd thing\
• relevant statute “specifically takes away the right [to a change of venue] in suits arising under that statute. It follows then from this line of reasoning, that [T.R. 76] does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).