Ameziane v. Obama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the narrower the category for which the [G]overnment seeks protection, the more likely the ... rationale will be sufficiently tailored” to support non-disclosure
• holding that disclo- sure of redacted text would be “effectively unreviewable” because “the disclosure cannot be undone”
• requiring “at a minimum, a ‘specific,’ ‘tailored’ rationale for protecting a general category of information, and a precise designation of each particular item of information” withheld as law-enforcement sensitive
• district court erred by elevating petitioner’s interest [REDACTED] over the Government’s interest [REDACTED]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).