Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Donaghy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he conjuring of ‘perhaps possible’ scenarios is inadequate grounds for a demonstration of the need to call an attorney to testify”
• “The conjuring of ‘perhaps possible’ scenarios is inadequate grounds for a demonstration of the need to call an attorney to testify, or a demonstration that such testimony would be prejudicial.”
• “The conjuring of ‘perhaps possible’ scenarios is inadequate grounds for a demonstration . . . that such testimony would be prejudicial.”
• discussing various distinctions that have emerged in the Second Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).