Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding disqualification too prejudicial to client and that disqualification would not further purposes of ethical rules
• “the Court concludes that RJR Nabisco, through its subsidiary Reynolds Tobacco, was a client of LeBoeuf’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).