Skip to main content
· 12/19/1996

Paper Savers, Inc. v. Nacsa

Citations

  • 51 Cal. App. 4th 1090
  • 59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 547
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 15255
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9302
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1190
  • 1996 WL 727910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the omission of an agent being equivalent to providing incorrect information
  • insurance agent may be liable for negligence in failing to procure specifically requested insurance coverage
  • insurance company’s agent could be liable for negligently misrepresenting that a “replacement cost coverage” provision was sufficient to replace all lost or damaged property regardless of policy limits when policy did not provide such coverage
  • an insurance agent assumes a greater duty only by (1) express agreement, (2) holding himself out as having special expertise in the field, (3) misrepresenting the extent or scope of the coverage, or (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.