Skip to main content
· 11/26/1986

Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Citations

  • 187 Cal. App. 3d 513
  • 231 Cal. Rptr. 715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A purported agent’s act may be adopted expressly or ... by implication based on conduct of the purported principal from which an intention to consent or adopt the act may be fairly inferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.