MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 18 remand is proper where “there is a non-fanciful possibility that plaintiff can state a claim”
• “If there is a non-fanciful possibility that plaintiff can state a claim under California law against the non-diverse defendants the court must remand.”
• “If there is a non-fanciful possibility that plaintiff can state a claim under California law against the non-diverse defendants the court must remand.”
• “If there is a non-fanciful possibility that plaintiff can state a claim under California law against the non-diverse defendants the court must remand.”
• “If there is a non-fanciful possibility that plaintiff can state a claim under California law against the non-diverse defendants the court must remand.”
• “If there is a non-fanciful 4 possibility that plaintiff can state a claim under California law against the non-diverse 5 defendants the court must remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).