Skip to main content
· 5/29/2002

Budden v. Dykstra

Citations

  • 47 P.3d 49
  • 181 Or. App. 523
  • 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the trial court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them,” and acknowledging the policy rea- sons underlying the preservation rule, including giving the parties and the court the opportunity to respond to or correct the error
  • noting that the trial court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them,” and acknowledging the policy rea- sons underlying the preservation rule, including giving the parties and the court the opportunity to respond to or correct the error
  • The court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them.”
  • issue of lesser sanctions not raised until a month after sanctions were imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Brewer, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.