· 5/29/2002
Budden v. Dykstra
Citations
- 47 P.3d 49
- 181 Or. App. 523
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 859
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them,” and acknowledging the policy rea- sons underlying the preservation rule, including giving the parties and the court the opportunity to respond to or correct the error
- noting that the trial court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them,” and acknowledging the policy rea- sons underlying the preservation rule, including giving the parties and the court the opportunity to respond to or correct the error
- The court “cannot be faulted for failing to make such findings if no one requested them.”
- issue of lesser sanctions not raised until a month after sanctions were imposed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.