Bielunas v. F/V Misty Dawn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “[a] relevancy- based argument is usually a tough sell” given how broadly the Federal Rules of Evidence define relevance
• affirming award of over $2,000,000 in non-economic damages where plaintiff sustained painful foot injury that resulted in disability
• collecting cases and noting the First Circuit is quite out of step in this regard
• explaining when the court can take that tack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).