D. Maryland· 12/17/1993
Pack v. AC AND S, INC.
Citations
- 838 F. Supp. 1099
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18286
- 1993 WL 522958
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that military contractor that manufactured tur bine generators was entitled to federal officer removal where the government maintained “control over the construction, design and testing of the turbines” and specified the type of asbestos cloth used
- “‘Direct control’ is established by showing strong government intervention and the possibility that a defendant will be sued in state court as a result of the federal control.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joseph H. Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bennett v. MIS CORP.Sixth Circuit· 2010-06-04· cited 202×
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.Second Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 93×
- Good v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-01-18· cited 37×
- Virden v. Altria Group, Inc.N.D. West Virginia· 2004-01-30· cited 27×
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.E.D. New York· 2004-02-09· cited 26×
- Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.S.D. Ohio· 2002-09-20· cited 25×
- Freiberg v. Swinerton & Walberg Property Services, Inc.D. Colorado· 2002-11-04· cited 24×
- Link Telecommunications, Inc. v. SappersteinD. Maryland· 2000-11-08· cited 21×
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsD. Maryland· 2002-06-21· cited 20×
- Reed v. Fina Oil & Chemical Co.E.D. Texas· 1998-02-24· cited 19×
- Arnold Ex Rel. Arnold v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1997-04-30· cited 18×
- Crocker v. Borden, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 1994-05-06· cited 15×
- Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.D. Massachusetts· 2008-01-03· cited 11×
- Rodgers v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceW.D. Virginia· 1997-01-30· cited 10×
- Ruffin v. Armco Steel Corp.S.D. Texas· 1997-03-31· cited 7×
- Hines v. AC AND S, INC.N.D. Texas· 2001-01-24· cited 5×
- Quick v. Shell Oil Co.S.D. New York· 2005-10-06· cited 3×
- Pinney v. NokiaD. Maryland· 2002-06-21· cited 3×
- Jewel v. UnumProvident Corp.D. Massachusetts· 2005-01-06· cited 2×
- Green v. A.W. Chesterton Co.D. Maine· 2005-02-22· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 1,399×
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 653×
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 585×
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 500×
- Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.E.D. New York· 1992-01-29· cited 96×
- Fung v. Abex Corp.N.D. California· 1992-10-26· cited 39×
- Riggs v. Continental Baking Co.N.D. California· 1988-02-09· cited 34×
- Bonnell v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyN.D. Florida· 1962-01-30· cited 34×
- Rollwitz v. Burlington Northern RailroadD. Montana· 1981-01-28· cited 28×
- Brooks v. Solomon Co.N.D. Alabama· 1982-06-29· cited 28×
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1987-08-27· cited 22×
- Zbranek v. HofheinzE.D. Texas· 1989-11-13· cited 18×
- Smith v. International Harvester Co.D. Nevada· 1985-11-06· cited 16×
- Bakalis v. Crossland Savings BankE.D. New York· 1991-12-17· cited 15×
- Roberson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.N.D. Indiana· 1991-08-16· cited 13×
- Bahrs v. Hughes Aircraft Co.D. Arizona· 1992-07-02· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.