Skip to main content
· 1/28/1981

Rollwitz v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Citations

  • 507 F. Supp. 582
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when removability contested by timely motion to remand the district court has obligation to make a factual inquiry into that issue
  • “No purpose is served by requiring the defendant, 14 or the court, to speculate as to the amount in controversy when that amount can be 15 ascertained from the plaintiff within a reasonable time through normal discovery 16 procedures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.