Pace v. Pace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's decision denying motion to modify and ordering movant to pay arrearage despite movant's claimed financial hardship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grogan v. Penza
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-10-29· cited 7×
• L. W. v. M. W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-11-02

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Russell v. Russell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-27· cited 78×
• In Re Leah S.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-12-18· cited 66×
• Rosier v. Rosier
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-21· cited 16×
• LaBossiere v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-22· cited 12×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-25· cited 11×
• Gil v. Gil
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-10-14· cited 9×
• Hodgate v. Ferraro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-31· cited 6×