Skip to main content
· 11/23/2010

Rosier v. Rosier

Citations

  • 705 S.E.2d 595
  • 227 W. Va. 88
  • 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the basis of any ‘claim’” under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act “cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband’s] death” (emphasis added)
  • concluding that \the basis of any 'claim' \ under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act \cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband's] death\ (emphasis added)
  • concluding that “the basis of any ‘claim’” under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act “cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband’s] death” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.