· 11/23/2010
Rosier v. Rosier
Citations
- 705 S.E.2d 595
- 227 W. Va. 88
- 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the basis of any ‘claim’” under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act “cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband’s] death” (emphasis added)
- concluding that \the basis of any 'claim' \ under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act \cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband's] death\ (emphasis added)
- concluding that “the basis of any ‘claim’” under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act “cannot be founded upon whether the affected property would have been declared marital property had the [parties] been seeking a divorce prior to [the husband’s] death” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.