Skip to main content

In Re Leah S.

Citations

  • 935 A.2d 1021
  • 284 Conn. 685
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because trial court order was ‘‘ambiguous at the outset, and therefore con- ferred broad discretion’’ on party, party, ‘‘far from employing self-help tactics . . . instead employed the broad discretion conferred upon it by the court’’
  • recognizing existence of ‘‘important public policy against resorting to self-help tactics’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Katz, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Leah S.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.