Veterans Claims· 11/22/2002

Ozer v. Principi

Citations

16 Vet. App. 475
2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 942
2002 WL 31641710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Secretary’s position in promulgating the regulation was substantially justified, despite later invalidation of the regulation, because “there was no pri- or disapproval of or challenge to the regulation”
rejecting reimbursement for time spent on motions for extended time due to inefficient workload management
finding the Secretary’s position substantially justified where, inter alia, the “case was one of first impression” and “there was no prior disapproval of or challenge to the [Secretary’s interpretation]”
finding the Secretary’s position substantially justified where, inter alia, the “case was one of first impression” and “there was no prior disapproval of or challenge to the [Secretary’s interpretation]”
finding the Secretary's position substantially justified where, inter alia, the \case was one of first impression\ and \there was no prior disapproval of or challenge to the [Secretary's interpretation]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holdaway, Ivers, Per Curiam, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.