Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 3/11/1993

Felton v. Brown

Citations

  • 4 Vet. App. 363
  • 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 89
  • 1993 WL 65730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that RO had accepted as an NOD a notation of a “telephone inquiry, on behalf of the veteran, to the ... RO from Ohio U.S. Senator Glenn’s office”
  • where matter was decided on non-constitutional grounds, Court did not need to address constitutional issues
  • Court notes that Court had previously decided that VA written note of telephone inquiry from U.S. Senator on behalf of veteran whose claim RO had denied constituted valid, jurisdiction-conferring NOD
  • prior to reaching any constitutional questions, the Court must consider nonconstitutional grounds for decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ivers, Kramer, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.