Skip to main content

Owens v. State

Citations

  • 659 N.E.2d 466
  • 1995 Ind. LEXIS 181
  • 1995 WL 737281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that substantial evidence of probative value was presented on each element of each alleged instance of intimidation and finding no basis to disturb the jury’s verdicts
  • upholding the admission of evidence where no return was ever filed because Owens had not shown that he was prejudiced from the failure to file
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the evidence of a threat was insufficient because his words were “neither serious nor taken seriously” and finding no basis to disturb the jury’s verdict
  • explaining how a reasonable jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant knowingly killed the victim because of the brutality of the beating combined with threats to witnesses
  • \The trial court could have limited [the officer's] testimony to the fact that he took certain steps in response to what [the victim] had told him.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Debruler, Dickson, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.