Second Circuit· 7/9/1979
Owens v. Haas
Citations
- 601 F.2d 1242
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- gross negligence or “deliberate indifference”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Second Circuit· 1980-01-08· cited 748×
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 571×
- Estate Frank P. Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutors OffiThird Circuit· 2014-10-15· cited 270×
- LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherSecond Circuit· 1995-09-21· cited 250×
- Margaret Rookard v. Health and Hospitals CorporationSecond Circuit· 1983-06-09· cited 201×
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.Second Circuit· 1995-05-17· cited 175×
- Ricciuti v. Transit AuthoritySecond Circuit· 1991-08-05· cited 164×
- Washington v. JamesSecond Circuit· 1986-02-03· cited 157×
- James Hirst v. Jean GertzenNinth Circuit· 1982-05-10· cited 132×
- Ayanna Blue v. District of Columbia PublicD.C. Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 122×
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)S.D. New York· 1991-06-27· cited 113×
- United States v. Yonkers Board of EducationS.D. New York· 1985-11-20· cited 87×
- Spear, Leeds & Kellogg v. Central Life Assurance Company, Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Company of America, Inc., Canada Life Assurance Co.Second Circuit· 1996-05-16· cited 75×
- Bergquist v. County of CochiseNinth Circuit· 1986-12-23· cited 71×
- In Re\ Agent Orange\ Product Liability LitigationE.D. New York· 1984-02-21· cited 42×
- Calkins v. BlumN.D. New York· 1981-04-15· cited 37×
- Brewster v. Nassau CountyE.D. New York· 2004-12-13· cited 31×
- Martin v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 1985-08-21· cited 30×
- Garrido v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1989-06-27· cited 24×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court· 1976-01-26· cited 5,802×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 3,337×
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,039×
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 1,075×
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 787×
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 657×
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court· 1972-04-24· cited 610×
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-10-26· cited 510×
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 505×
- William Oscar Hampton v. Holmesburg Prison Officials. Appeal of Richard BurkThird Circuit· 1976-12-28· cited 235×
- Owens v. HaasSecond Circuit· 1979-07-09· cited 211×
- Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthoritySecond Circuit· 1970-04-29· cited 210×
- Ivy Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and New York Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1968-02-13· cited 186×
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. ParnellSupreme Court· 1956-11-13· cited 168×
- Leite v. City of Providence Ex Rel. McKiernanD. Rhode Island· 1978-12-21· cited 133×
- Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1975-06-16· cited 87×
- Thornton v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencySupreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.