S.D. New York· 6/27/1989
Garrido v. Coughlin
Citations
- 716 F. Supp. 98
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7140
- 1989 WL 71994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a “verbal confrontation” with a guard regarding the 3 guard’s “abusive treatment of another inmate” is not protected conduct
- holding that the inmate plaintiff was not engaged in protected conduct when he had a \verbal confrontation\ with a correctional officer
- distinguishing between an exercise of First Amendment rights and a mere \verbal confrontation\ with prison staff
- inmate’s “verbal confrontation” with correctional officer over 23 the “allegedly abusive treatment of another inmate” did not give rise to a First Amendment 24 retaliation claim
- “While there is a claim of retaliation here ..., it was not for exercise of [the plaintiff's] First Amendment rights; rather, the alleged retaliation arose out of a verbal confrontation.”
- “While there is a claim of retaliation here ..., it was not for exercise of [the plaintiff's] First Amendment rights; rather, the alleged retaliation arose out of a verbal confrontation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lasker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Torres v. MazzucaS.D. New York· 2003-02-25· cited 65×
- Rivera v. GoordS.D. New York· 2000-09-26· cited 40×
- Watson v. McGinnisS.D. New York· 1997-05-01· cited 35×
- Santiago v. MilesW.D. New York· 1991-10-01· cited 24×
- Webster v. FischerN.D. New York· 2010-03-09· cited 24×
- Zamakshari v. DvoskinS.D. New York· 1995-09-08· cited 21×
- Abdush-Shahid v. CoughlinN.D. New York· 1996-06-24· cited 20×
- APA Excelsior III L.P. v. Premiere Technologies, Inc.S.D. New York· 1999-05-19· cited 17×
- Heyliger v. KrygierW.D. New York· 2018-09-28· cited 9×
- Doolittle v. RuffoN.D. New York· 1994-03-15· cited 6×
- Wright v. CoughlinW.D. New York· 1998-12-17· cited 6×
- Taylor v. SullivanS.D. New York· 1997-10-08· cited 4×
- Jackson v. New York Department of Correctional ServicesS.D. New York· 1998-02-11· cited 2×
- Dixon v. LeonardoN.D. New York· 1995-05-08· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,017×
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 571×
- Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutSecond Circuit· 1986-12-30· cited 559×
- Josephina Duchesne as Administratrix of the Estate of Pauline Perez v. Jule M. SugarmanSecond Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 380×
- Robert D. Sprouse v. David Babcock, Charles Harper and Ronald G. WelderEighth Circuit· 1989-03-20· cited 326×
- Francisco Franco v. Walter Kelly, Lt. Moscicki and Officer HigleySecond Circuit· 1988-07-25· cited 299×
- Alfaro Motors, Inc. v. WardSecond Circuit· 1987-03-25· cited 137×
- Gill v. MooneySecond Circuit· 1987-07-16· cited 136×
- Tony Scott Trucking, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1987-10-13· cited 129×
- Michael A. Bolden, Sr. v. Al Alston, Superintendent, Lincoln Correctional Facility, Nathaniel Hayes, Sergeant and Edward Kirkland, SergeantSecond Circuit· 1987-01-28· cited 123×
- Wright v. McMannSecond Circuit· 1972-03-16· cited 110×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Tyrone B. Larkins v. Russell G. Oswald, Commissioner of Corrections of New York StateSecond Circuit· 1975-01-24· cited 91×
- Owens v. HaasSecond Circuit· 1979-07-09· cited 73×
- Leady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 64×
- Belt v. UtahSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.