Supreme Court· 12/17/1973
Outpost Development Corp. v. United States
Citations
- 414 U.S. 1105
- 94 S. Ct. 832
- 38 L. Ed. 2d 733
- 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that burden of proof may be deemed procedural for some purposes and not for others
- stating that a court “may deliberately decide issues which need not be decided when it believes that course is warranted”
- permitting a court to decide issues not requiring decision when the court “believes that course is warranted”
- permitting a court to “decide issues which need not be decided when it believes that course is warranted”
- involving the validity of Rule 4:42-11(b), which authorizes] prejudgment interest in tort actions
- no review of forced retirement of officers after specified number of years of military service
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
164 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 620×
- Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 296×
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1988-04-19· cited 265×
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-06-09· cited 234×
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-03-24· cited 223×
- North Bergen Rex Transport, Inc. v. Trailer Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-06-23· cited 154×
- Trentacost v. BrusselSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-03-12· cited 145×
- Draper v. Airco, Inc.Third Circuit· 1978-06-28· cited 140×
- Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-10· cited 124×
- Jarvis v. JohnsonThird Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 99×
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-04-26· cited 94×
- Coons v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-06-13· cited 91×
- Warwick v. MatheneyMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-06-10· cited 90×
- In Re the Appeal of Certain Sections of the Uniform Administrative Procedure RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-06-29· cited 78×
- Bond v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-03-31· cited 72×
- Gabriel I. Penagaricano v. Orlando LlenzaFirst Circuit· 1984-11-02· cited 70×
- State v. MolnarSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-01-10· cited 66×
- In The Matter Of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanySeventh Circuit· 1986-10-20· cited 59×
- Charles A. Nesmith v. Clyde E. FultonFifth Circuit· 1980-04-07· cited 56×
- Irene Lindenau v. Clifford AlexanderTenth Circuit· 1981-10-28· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.