· 11/2/1984
Gabriel I. Penagaricano v. Orlando Llenza
Citations
- 747 F.2d 55
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17045
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiff's procedural due process claim was \insubstantial\ because plaintiff lacked \a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment with the Guard\
- noting that plaintiff's procedural due process claim was \insubstantial\ because plaintiff lacked \a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment with the Guard\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Breyer, Gierbolini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.