Skip to main content

Outlaw v. State

Citations

  • 858 S.E.2d 63
  • 311 Ga. 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Mobley to hold that Gary did not foreclose the application 59 of two other kinds of good faith exception when evidence was illegally seized without a warrant and to affirm the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence
  • “Decisions about which defenses to present and which jury charges to request are classic matters of trial strategy, and pursuit of an all- or-nothing defense is generally a permissible strategy.”
  • “It is the premise of Miranda that the danger of coercion results from the interaction of custody and official interrogation.” (punctuation omitted), quoting Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292, 297 (II) (110 SCt 2394, 110 LE2d 243) (1990)
  • “[T]he good-faith exception for objectively reasonable reliance on a statute that appeared legitimately to allow a warrantless search applies with equal force here, because 18 USC § 2703 (c) (1) (B) and (d) authorized the State’s investigative conduct at the time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.