Osborne v. State
Citations
- 33 Fla. 162
Syllabus
<p>. 1. A state can not tax or regulate interstate commerce, or make the payment of a tax or the taking out of a license a condition precedent to carrying on interstate commerce. A state statute which does so, either expressly or in effect, is offensive to the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States, and void at least to that extent. The same is true as to foreign commerce.</p> <p>2. A state statute which imposes a tax, in general terms, on the doing of specified kinds of business, or the pursuit of designated occupations, in the state, and requires that a license shall be taken out before any such business or avocation shall be done or engaged in, should not be construed to apply to any business of the kind that may constitute interstate commerce, but only to business that is domestic or state commerce and to persons engaged or intending to engage in such domestic or state business.</p> <p>8. Although interstate commerce can not be taxed or regulated by-state legislation, and the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution exempts all such commerce from regulation or taxation by state authority, yet the doing of business that constitutes interstate commerce by a person who is also at the same time engaged in business, of the same kind, that constitutes state or local commerce, can not be made a bar or exemption of the local or state commerce business from taxation or regulation by state authority.</p> <p>- 4. The ninth section of the general revenue law of 1893 (Chapter - 4115, approved June 2nd, 1893), provides that no person shall engage in or manage the business, profession or avocation men tioned therein without first taking out a state license as provided therein and paying the occupational tax and license fee . prescribed thereby; and it authorizes counties and incorporporated cities and towns to impose further taxes. As to express companies its special provisions, substituting figures for words, are as follows: “All express companies doing b
Judges: Raney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 175×
- In re Seizure of 7 Barrels of WineSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-01-14· cited 61×
- Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court· 1897-12-03· cited 59×
- Hardee v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 53×
- Ferguson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-12-17· cited 47×
- Smith v. ChaseSupreme Court of Florida· 1925-06-05· cited 30×
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1907-03-18· cited 13×
- State Revenue Commission v. Edgar Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1937-11-11· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Coleman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1907-05-11· cited 10×
- State v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1903-01-29· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Rand v. BrogdenSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-11-15· cited 7×
- State Revenue Commission v. Edgar Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1937-03-17· cited 6×
- Amos v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1918-11-19· cited 2×
- Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida· 1930-01-15· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1869-11-18· cited 857×
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1827-03-12· cited 822×
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 570×
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 374×
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1888-01-30· cited 341×
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 324×
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court· 1876-11-18· cited 306×
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 283×
- McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 139×
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 94×
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. East St. LouisSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 88×
- WU Tel. Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1888-03-19· cited 78×
- Moran v. New OrleansSupreme Court· 1884-11-03· cited 58×
- Ex parte PrinceSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.