· 2/3/2011
Osborne v. Dumoulin
Citations
- 55 So. 3d 577
- 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43
- 2011 Fla. LEXIS 291
- 2011 WL 320986
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the failure to strictly comply with 222.01 and 222.02 does not waive a homeowner’s homestead rights
- stating that just because a debtor in bankruptcy may lose the protection of the constitutional homestead exemption by not claiming the exemption does not mean “that every debtor who does not assert the homestead exemption in bankruptcy is not receiving the benefits of the exemption”
- Conversely, if the debtor does claim the homestead exemption he is receiving the benefits of the constitutional homestead exemption.
- describing the self-executing nature of the homestead exemption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Labarga, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.