M.D. Florida· 10/8/2008
In Re Bennett
Citations
- 395 B.R. 781
- 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 538
- 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2856
- 2008 WL 4490714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing certain advantages that do not constitute a benefit of the Homestead Exemption in an analysis that was adopted in Dumoulin.
- “A debtor who does not claim the Homestead Exemption may still receive its benefits in certain limited circumstances that can only be determined on a case-by-case basis, after a fact-intensive inquiry.”
- “Whether a debtor has equity in the property, lives in the home, or enjoys any other types of tax benefits has no relevance to the question of whether a debtor receives the benefits of the Florida Homestead Exemption.”
- “There would be no reason for the legislature to have allowed the exemption for a debtor who ‘does not claim or receive the benefits of if it truly meant merely that a debtor ‘could claim’ or ‘is eligible to claim’ the Homestead Exemption.”
- “The general benefits of owning a home are also irrelevant to this analysis. Whether a debtor has equity in the property, lives in the home, or enjoys any other types of tax benefits has no relevance to the question of whether a debtor receives the benefits of the Florida Homestead Exemption.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael G. Williamson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Osborne v. DumoulinSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-02-03· cited 19×
- In Re HarleM.D. Florida· 2010-01-13· cited 10×
- In Re KentM.D. Florida· 2009-08-10· cited 8×
- In Re WatfordS.D. Florida· 2010-04-13· cited 5×
- In Re AbbottS.D. Florida· 2009-06-26· cited 5×
- In Re WilsonM.D. Florida· 2011-02-24· cited 5×
- In Re GentryM.D. Florida· 2011-11-15· cited 4×
- In Re OrozcoS.D. Florida· 2011-02-07· cited 4×
- In Re ArcherS.D. Florida· 2009-10-02· cited 3×
- In re BarandiaranM.D. Florida· 2012-01-27· cited 3×
- In Re IulianoM.D. Florida· 2010-12-28· cited 2×
- In re MartinezS.D. Florida· 2019-01-07· cited 2×
- In re WaltonS.D. Florida· 2013-11-15· cited 1×
- In re GeigerM.D. Florida· 2016-11-21· cited 1×
- In re ValoneM.D. Florida· 2013-09-04
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Havoco of America, Ltd. v. HillSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-21· cited 111×
- Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La CroixSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-01-31· cited 87×
- Hechtman v. Nations Title Ins. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-06· cited 85×
- In re SmithSeventh Circuit· 1981-02-17· cited 70×
- McLain v. Newhouse Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of McLainFifth Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 66×
- Tramel v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-19· cited 33×
- Chames v. DeMayoSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-12-20· cited 30×
- Olesky v. NicholasSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-09-16· cited 30×
- In Re GattoM.D. Florida· 2008-07-07· cited 26×
- In Re FranzeseM.D. Florida· 2008-02-19· cited 25×
- In Re MagelitzN.D. Florida· 2008-04-28· cited 18×
- Cyrak v. PoynorN.D. Texas· 1987-11-25· cited 16×
- In Re MoralesS.D. Florida· 2008-01-02· cited 16×
- DeQuervain v. DesguinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-05· cited 8×
- In Re JordanM.D. Florida· 2005-09-26· cited 4×
- In Re AndrewsD. Utah· 2008-05-06· cited 3×
- In Re GuididasM.D. Florida· 2008-08-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.