Ilkanic v. City of Fort Lauderdale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a civil restitution judgment is not a component of criminal punishment and therefore does not violate equal protection or substantive due process when imposed by the court after sentencing
• concluding \that imposing a per diem charge on convicted offenders clearly relates to a permissive legislative objective of reimbursing public bodies for the costs expended in incarcerating these persons\
• holding a civil 2 restitution judgment imposed after sentencing does not violate equal protection or substantive due process rights
• upholding $50 per diem charge on convicted prisoners under section 960.293(2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), because charge \clearly relates to a permissive legislative objective of reimbursing public bodies for the costs expended in incarcerating these persons\
• noting the same intent behind a predecessor statute to section 953.033(1)
• noting the same intent behind a predecessor statute to section 953.033(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).