W.D. Pennsylvania· 7/6/1984
Orchard v. Covelli
Citations
- 590 F. Supp. 1548
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “any attempt to ‘squeeze out’ a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of [] fiduciary duty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory AncelSeventh Circuit· 1995-06-30· cited 101×
- Burger King Corp. v. AgadS.D. Florida· 1995-09-29· cited 86×
- G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-02· cited 79×
- Fought v. MorrisMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 65×
- Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-03· cited 62×
- Brenner v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-12-29· cited 49×
- Browne v. MaxfieldE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-01-12· cited 45×
- Linde, B. v. Linde, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-10-11· cited 40×
- Stanger v. Athos Steel Aluminum, Inc. (In Re Athos Steel & Aluminum, Inc.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-03-16· cited 36×
- Walensky v. Jonathan Royce Intern.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-05-04· cited 33×
- Bair v. PurcellM.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-08-02· cited 32×
- Van Shaack Holdings Ltd. v. Van SchaackSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-31· cited 31×
- Brothers v. WinsteadMississippi Supreme Court· 2014-01-09· cited 24×
- McLaughlin v. SchenckUtah Supreme Court· 2009-10-02· cited 18×
- Muellenberg v. Bikon Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-01-18· cited 17×
- Byelick v. VivadelliE.D. Virginia· 1999-12-20· cited 17×
- Johnston v. WilbournS.D. Mississippi· 1991-01-11· cited 15×
- Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc.)C.D. California· 1986-08-13· cited 14×
- Bostock v. High Tech Elevator Ind.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-11-25· cited 14×
- Grill v. AversaM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-11-08· cited 10×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 514×
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-02· cited 335×
- United States v. ByrumSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 192×
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-09-23· cited 161×
- Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1952-05-01· cited 104×
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1923-03-28· cited 104×
- Louis J. Martino and McDonald Drive-In of Ottumwa, Iowa, Inc., Plaintiffs v. McDonald System, Inc. And Franchise Realty Interstate CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1979-05-09· cited 89×
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1968-12-24· cited 56×
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationE.D. Pennsylvania· 1941-12-20· cited 34×
- Harriman v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.D. Delaware· 1975-12-23· cited 24×
- In re the Election of Directors of William Faehndrich, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1957-03-08· cited 15×
- Fleming v. MacK Trucks, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-02-25· cited 14×
- Rumbaugh v. BeckE.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-06-13· cited 12×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Summa Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1977-05-10· cited 11×
- McDonald's Corp. v. Markim, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-05-29· cited 10×
- Coleman v. TaubThird Circuit· 1981-01-08· cited 9×
- Hyman v. Velsicol Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1951-03-13· cited 8×
- Carr v. Carr O'Brien Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-09-24· cited 8×
- Johnston v. Livingston Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1968-03-14· cited 7×
- Thrasher v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-08-03· cited 7×
Other cases named Orchard v. Covelli
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.