Skip to main content
· 4/19/1989

Fought v. Morris

Citations

  • 543 So. 2d 167
  • 1989 WL 37951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing members of closely-held corporation-like members of partnerships-owe fiduciary duties to each other in addition to the corporation
  • “‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty . . . .’”
  • “ ‘any attempt [by the majority] to squeeze out a minority shareholder must be viewed as a breach of his fiduciary duty ....’”
  • “The traditional view that shareholders have no fiduciary duty to each other, and transactions constituting ‘freeze outs’ or ‘squeeze outs’ generally cannot be attacked as a breach of duty of loyalty or good faith to each other, is outmoded.”
  • regarding the “freezing out” of a minority shareholder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Prather and Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.