O'QUINN v. Beach Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a contract may be avoided on grounds of fraud
• \The testimony ... was offered to establish a conclusion of law within the exclusive province of the court and thus was properly excluded\
• “[Investment contracts may be found where the investor has duties that are nominal and insignificant or where the investor lacks any real control over the operation of the enterprise.”
• where expert testimony was offered to establish a conclusion of law, the Court held that the trial court properly excluded the testimony because that was within the exclusive province of the trial court
• investment contracts may be found where the investor has duties that are nominal and insignificant or where the investor lacks any real control over the operation of the enterprise
• where expert testimony was offered to establish a conclusion of law, the Court held that the trial court proper ly excluded the testimony because that was within the exclusive province of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).