Skip to main content
· 7/6/1987

Garrett v. Snedigar

Citations

  • 359 S.E.2d 283
  • 293 S.C. 176
  • 1987 S.C. App. LEXIS 348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Summary judgment is inappropriate where further inquiry into the facts of the case is desirable to clarify the application of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders, Goolsby, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.