· 4/11/1985
Giles v. Lanford & Gibson, Inc.
Citations
- 328 S.E.2d 916
- 285 S.C. 285
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- insured could not have deciphered the language sufficiently to conclude the policy provided a different coverage than that represented by an insurance agent
- insured could not have deciphered the language sufficiently to conclude the policy provided a different coverage than that represented by an insurance agent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Sanders, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.