Skip to main content
· 4/11/1985

Giles v. Lanford & Gibson, Inc.

Citations

  • 328 S.E.2d 916
  • 285 S.C. 285
  • 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insured could not have deciphered the language sufficiently to conclude the policy provided a different coverage than that represented by an insurance agent
  • insured could not have deciphered the language sufficiently to conclude the policy provided a different coverage than that represented by an insurance agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Sanders, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.